netdev - Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <24861.1188711996@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Sun, 02 Sep 2007 01:46:36 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	"Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@...il.com>
Cc:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, jirislaby@...il.com,
	Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing

On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 01:09:18 EDT, "Constantine A. Murenin" said:

> The idea here is that no patching was needed in the first place --
> most of the files are/were BSD-licensed, because they were forked from
> OpenBSD.

Oh, silly me.  For some reason, I had it in my head that Jiri's original
patch actually included some real live *code* in addition to the parts that
changed the licensing text... ;)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped