[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3642txj91.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:57:30 +0200
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Igor Sobrado <igor@...dmat1.ciencias.uniovi.es>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
"Constantine A. Murenin" <mureninc@...il.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
IANAL, but:
Igor Sobrado <igor@...dmat1.ciencias.uniovi.es> writes:
> So, under a dual-licensed BSD/GPL code the latter license allows a
> developer to remove the GPL license itself and release a
> single-licensed BSD code if other parties want to do it?
Of course. If it wasn't legal, dual BSD/GPL would just be equal
to GPL. Now, dual BSD/GPL equals BSD.
OTOH I'd probable leave the original licence text, something like:
The actual licence conditions:
GPL or BSD or whatever.
Portions of this file were licenced under:
[the original licence text, not valid as a licence for current file]
WRT Atheros driver I'd probably leave the thing as is (i.e., BSD/GPL
= in fact BSD), unless something like 50+% of the code is rewritten -
it's mostly their hard work after all, isn't it? Not legal
requirement, though.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists