netdev - Re: [patch 02/18] sundance: PHY address form 0, only for device I D 0x0200 (IP100A) (20070605)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46DBE52A.2010207@garzik.org>
Date:	Mon, 03 Sep 2007 06:42:50 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	黃建興-Jesse <Jesse@...lus.com.tw>
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 02/18] sundance: PHY address form 0, only for device I
 D 0x0200 (IP100A) (20070605)

黃建興-Jesse wrote:
> +++ a/drivers/net/sundance.c
> @@ -559,7 +559,11 @@ static int __devinit sundance_probe1 (st
>          * It seems some phys doesn't deal well with address 0 being 
> accessed
>          * first, so leave address zero to the end of the loop (32 & 31).
>          */
> -       for (phy = 1; phy <= 32 && phy_idx < MII_CNT; phy++) {
> +       if (sundance_pci_tbl[np->chip_id].device == 0x0200)
> +               phy = 0;
> +       else
> +               phy = 1;
> +       for (; phy <= 32 && phy_idx < MII_CNT; phy++) {


As I noted in the last email, this patch still has a bug:

In the above loop code being modified, you need to change two things:

1) Initial loop value
2) Loop terminating condition

Your patch only performs change #1.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html