| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:07:38 +0100 From: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com> To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org> CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, hadi@...erus.ca, davem@...emloft.net, jeff@...zik.org, mandeep.baines@...il.com, ossthema@...ibm.com Subject: Re: RFC: possible NAPI improvements to reduce interrupt rates for low traffic rates Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 16:30:30 +0100 > James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com> wrote: > >> Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> >>> What about the latency that NAPI imposes? Right now there are certain applications that >>> don't like NAPI because it add several more microseconds, and this may make it worse. >> >> Latency is something that I think this approach will actually improve, >> at the expense of additional polling. Or is it the ksoftirqd scheduling >> latency that you are referring to? > > The problem is that you leave interrupts disabled, right. Are you saying NAPI drivers should avoid keeping interrupts disabled? > Also you are busy during idle which kills powersaving and no hz clock. But perhaps some environments don't care about powersave because they are always busy? Embedded routers or network servers, for example. -- James Chapman Katalix Systems Ltd http://www.katalix.com Catalysts for your Embedded Linux software development - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists