[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46E1D27F.2040701@cs.wisc.edu>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:36:47 -0500
From: Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
To: open-iscsi@...glegroups.com
CC: davem@...emloft.net, mchristi@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
anilgv@...adcom.com, talm@...adcom.com, lusinsky@...adcom.com,
uri@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2][BNX2]: Add iSCSI support to BNX2 devices.
Some quick comments that got cut out of the original mail.
> +
> +/*
> + * map single buffer
> + */
> +static int bnx2i_map_single_buf(struct bnx2i_hba *hba,
> + struct bnx2i_cmd *cmd)
> +{
> + struct scsi_cmnd *sc = cmd->scsi_cmd;
> + struct iscsi_bd *bd = cmd->bd_tbl->bd_tbl;
> + int byte_count;
> + int bd_count;
> + u64 addr;
> +
> + byte_count = sc->request_bufflen;
> + sc->SCp.dma_handle =
> + pci_map_single(hba->pci_dev, sc->request_buffer,
> + sc->request_bufflen, sc->sc_data_direction);
> + addr = sc->SCp.dma_handle;
> +
> + if (byte_count > MAX_BD_LENGTH) {
> + bd_count = bnx2i_split_bd(cmd, addr, byte_count, 0);
> + } else {
> + bd_count = 1;
> + bd[0].buffer_addr_lo = addr & 0xffffffff;
> + bd[0].buffer_addr_hi = addr >> 32;
> + bd[0].buffer_length = sc->request_bufflen;
> + bd[0].flags = ISCSI_BD_FIRST_IN_BD_CHAIN |
> + ISCSI_BD_LAST_IN_BD_CHAIN;
> + }
> + bd[bd_count - 1].flags |= ISCSI_BD_LAST_IN_BD_CHAIN;
> +
> + return bd_count;
> +}
I think you should always be getting use_sg greater than zero now, so
the map single path is not needed.
> +
> +
> +/*
> + * map SG list
> + */
> +static int bnx2i_map_sg(struct bnx2i_hba *hba, struct bnx2i_cmd *cmd)
> +{
> + struct scsi_cmnd *sc = cmd->scsi_cmd;
> + struct iscsi_bd *bd = cmd->bd_tbl->bd_tbl;
> + struct scatterlist *sg;
> + int byte_count = 0;
> + int sg_frags;
> + int bd_count = 0;
> + int sg_count;
> + int sg_len;
> + u64 addr;
> + int i;
> +
> + sg = sc->request_buffer;
> + sg_count = pci_map_sg(hba->pci_dev, sg, sc->use_sg,
> + sc->sc_data_direction);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < sg_count; i++) {
> + sg_len = sg_dma_len(sg);
> + addr = sg_dma_address(sg);
> + if (sg_len > MAX_BD_LENGTH)
> + sg_frags = bnx2i_split_bd(cmd, addr, sg_len,
> + bd_count);
If you call blk_queue_max_segment_size() in the slave_configure callout
you can limit the size of the segments that the block layer builds so
they are smaller than MAX_BD_LENGTH. However, I am not sure how useful
that is. I think DMA-API.txt states that the mapping code is ok to
merged mutliple sglists entries into one so I think that means that we
can still end up with an entry that is larger than MAX_BD_LENGTH. Not
sure if there is way to tell the pci/dma map_sg code to limit this too.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists