[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1odg89byw.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:48:07 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] veth: Cleanly handle a missing peer_tb argument on creation.
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org> writes:
>> + }
>>
>> - tbp = peer_tb;
>> - } else
>> - tbp = tb;
>
> The intention of this part was to get the same parameters for
> peer as for the first device if no "peer" argument was specified
> for ip utility. Does it still work?
I know it is problematic because we try to assign the same name
to both network devices, if we assign a name to the primary
network device. That can't work.
Beyond that I had some really weird crashes while testing this
piece of code, especially when I did not specify a peer parameter.
So it was just easier to avoid the problem with this patch then
to completely root cause it.
I think the easiest semantic is to not have any peer parameters
if they were not specified, then to try and to figure out which
subset of parameters to copy. If I hadn't been getting weird
kernel crashes I would not have cared.
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists