lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:40:04 -0400
From:	"Andy Gospodarek" <>
To:	"Jay Vosburgh" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: update some distro-specific documentation

On 9/12/07, Jay Vosburgh <> wrote:
> Andy Gospodarek <> wrote:
> >I could do that, or we could just take this as-is and get initscripts
> >fixed up to account for this.  Does that seem reasonable?
>         Changing initscripts is fine, too, but is there then going to be
> some (perhaps small) installed base for which the documentation will be
> incorrect?

Sure, but it could be wrong if we updated the kernel doc again after
initscripts was fixed and some chose not to update initscripts on
their boxes.  There could be a note about running a particular version
of initscripts, but I'd rather not start down the path of turning the
kernel doc into something that looks like distro release notes.

Either way it seems like there could be a chance for something to be
out of sync, so I guess we just have to pick the one that seems 'least
bad.'  I'd vote for whatever creates the fewest kernel patches. ;-)
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists