netdev - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] allow admin/users to specify rto_min in milliseconds rather than jiffies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:39:57 +0200
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] allow admin/users to specify rto_min in
 milliseconds rather than jiffies

On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:28:42 -0700
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com> wrote:

> >> The api in netlink should be in milliseconds rather than compensating
> >> in the application (iproute2).
> > 
> > 
> > My understanding of the in-kernel rtnetlink code is far from complete, 
> > but it doesn't seem to have much in the way of provisions for unit 
> > conversion, which would suggest no nice suffix-based ui as in tc, and ip 
> > is already doing some massaging of units on the display side for a 
> > couple of the other parameters, so I'm at something of a loss.
> 
> So, I used the source and looked and saw that tc seems to convert 
> everything to nanoseconds and passes that to the kernel.  The user can 
> give it seconds, milliseconds, microseconds or nanoseconds by using a 
> suffix. It then does something ostensibly intelligent to display those 
> to the user.
> 
> Ip converts nothing when passing things to the kernel (rtt rttvar or rto 
> - when/if at least the intial rto changes are included - were they?), 
> but when they come-out of the kernel ip converts them to milliseconds. 
>   So the units in != the units out.
> 
> Tc seems much more friendly and less prone to user error.
> 
> I'm still not sure how "easily" rtnetlink can do conversions itself - 
> feedback there would be _very_ welcome - but at the very least, having 
> ip provide at least the illusion of what tc does would seem to be a good 
> thing.
> 
> rick jones

Your observations are correct. rtnetlink can't/shouldn't be doing conversions
itself.  The 'ip' command should use a consistent unit for all values and
do conversions if necessary.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html