netdev - Re: [PATCH][NETNS] Use list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse in setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070914144938.3ba643a5@oldman>
Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:49:38 +0200
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>, devel@...nvz.org,
	Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][NETNS] Use list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse in
 setup_net

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:39:32 +0400
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org> wrote:

> I proposed introducing a list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse
> macro to be used in setup_net() when unrolling the failed
> ->init callback.
> 
> Here is the macro and some more cleanup in the setup_net() itself
> to remove one variable from the stack :) Minor, but the code
> looks nicer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>

Maybe it is time to just eliminate the init hook from the API.
It has very few users, and there is no reason the setup needed
could be done before or after registering in most cases.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html