netdev - Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1189794677.2508.19.camel@xo-3E-67-34.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:31:17 -0400
From:	Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
To:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git patches] net driver fixes

On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 14:17 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Dan Williams wrote:
> > WTF?  why would the default be to _not_ propagate carrier state?  Are
> > there some mitigating circumstances that require this driver to not
> > notify the stack of carrier on/off?  Userspace stuff really should know
> > about the carrier state, and this disables it by default.
> 
> 
> The commit explains that...

I admit that I probably don't understand the system architecture of
where ehea would be used, but would this
cause /sys/class/net/ethX/carrier to be TRUE even if the device has no
carrier?  That seems quite wrong IMHO.  When does ehea not have a
carrier?  And in that case, does sysfs say 1 or 0 for the carrier?

Dan


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html