[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070916.192502.123919711.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 19:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
Cc: krkumar2@...ibm.com, johnpol@....mipt.ru,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, kaber@...sh.net,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, jagana@...ibm.com,
Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se, rick.jones2@...com, xma@...ibm.com,
gaagaan@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rdreier@...co.com,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, mcarlson@...adcom.com,
jeff@...zik.org, mchan@...adcom.com, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
kumarkr@...ux.ibm.com, tgraf@...g.ch, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
sri@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10 REV5] Implement skb batching and support in
IPoIB/E1000
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:14:21 -0400
> I still think this work - despite my vested interest - needs more
> scrutiny from a performance perspective.
Absolutely.
There are tertiary issues I'm personally interested in, for example
how well this stuff works when we enable software GSO on a non-TSO
capable card.
In such a case the GSO segment should be split right before we hit the
driver and then all the sub-segments of the original GSO frame batched
in one shot down to the device driver.
In this way you'll get a large chunk of the benefit of TSO without
explicit hardware support for the feature.
There are several cards (some even 10GB) that will benefit immensely
from this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists