[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070918.143134.112198097.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 14:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: w@....eu
Cc: mchan@...adcom.com, vda.linux@...glemail.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bnx2 dirver's firmware images
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:30:25 +0200
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 12:21:50PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > From: "Michael Chan" <mchan@...adcom.com>
> > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:05:51 -0700
> >
> > > The bnx2 firmware changes quite frequently. A new driver quite often
> > > requires new firmware to work correctly. Splitting them up makes things
> > > difficult for the user.
> > >
> > > The firmware in tg3 is a lot more mature and I don't expect it to
> > > change. I think tg3 is better suited for using request_firmware().
> >
> > Like I said, I think neither should change and the driver should
> > be fully functional when built statically into the kernel.
>
> Michael, doesn't a functional-yet-suboptimal firmware exist ? I mean,
> just the same principle as we all have kernels, boot CDs, statically
> built tools, etc... which run everywhere. If you have such a beast,
> maybe it would be a good start to have it in the kernel, and provide
> the users with the ability to upgrade the firmware once the system
> is able to do more complex things.
>
> Just a thought...
So let's save 60K instead of 80K.
I mean, the entire discussion is just plain silly :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists