netdev - Re: why does tcp_v[46]_conn_request not inc MIB stats

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	18 Sep 2007 13:07:39 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	sri@...ibm.com, rick.jones2@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why does tcp_v[46]_conn_request not inc MIB stats

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:

> This is limiting embryonic mini-socket creation.  The listen overflow
> should only increment when the 3-way handshake completion is aborted
> because the listening socket limit is exceeded, which is entirely
> different from the embryonic limit.

That's true, but I think Rick has a point in that there should 
be some sort of (different) counter counting this.  In general
I believe every point in the stack who drops a packet should
have a statistics counter so that it can be later diagnosed.

Rick, the best way to get such a counter in is to just send a patch,
don't ask for it.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html