netdev - Re: [RFC][NET_SCHED] explict hold dev tx lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1190208832.4259.6.camel@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:33:52 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kaber@...sh.net, dada1@...mosbay.com, johnpol@....mipt.ru
Subject: Re: [RFC][NET_SCHED] explict hold dev tx lock

On Mon, 2007-17-09 at 22:48 -0400, jamal wrote:

> Nothing much has changed from what it was before.
> The only difference is we let go of the queue lock before grabbing
> the tx lock which never mattered for LLTX. 
> Once we grab the tx lock it is the same logic and so far is working well
> on both tg3 and e1000 (which is LLTX). 
> I will continue to retest with net-2.6.24 once you complete rebasing
> and look around to see if anyone maybe affected.

Ok, this is looking solid with this mornings tree. Tested on a dual core
xeon with e1000 (LLTX) and a dual core opteron with tg3 (non-LLTX).
About 100 million packets from udp full throttle on all 4 cpus; i tried
pulling cables etc while doing this to generate extrenous interupts and
didnt see any issues.

Shall i submit the patch?

cheers,
jamal

 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html