[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070920153358.7a491456@freepuppy.rosehill>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:33:58 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sky2: be more selective about FIFO watchdog
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:46:01 -0400
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com> wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:51:13 -0400
> > Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>> Be more selective about when to enable the ram buffer watchdog code.
> >>> It is unnecessary on XL A3 or later revs, and with Yukon FE
> >>> the buffer is so small (4K) that the watchdog detects false positives.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
> >> With all the sky2 patches flying about, it would be wise to include
> >> notes like "applies to 2.6.23-rc" or "net-2.6.24" after the standard
> >> "---" terminator.
> >>
> >> is this patch supposed to go on top of the sky2 patches that Linus just
> >> pulled?
> >>
> >>
> > It can go after previous 6 on both 2.6.23-rc and net-2.6.24 (with fuzz)
>
> Is it _needed_ in 2.6.23-rc, Mr. Maintainer? :)
>
> The answer to that question is not clear to me, given the description
> and code.
Yes, the patch is needed, because when tested on Yukon FE laptop,
the 2.6.23-rc driver falsely thinks the receiver is stuck. Sorry, I didn't
catch it sooner, but that is the one flavor of chip I don't have to test
on.
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists