netdev - Re: [LARTC] ifb and ppp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46F2910E.9040900@trash.net>
Date:	Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:26:06 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	Frithjof Hammer <mail@...thjof-hammer.de>
CC:	hadi@...erus.ca, lartc@...lman.ds9a.nl,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LARTC] ifb and ppp

Frithjof Hammer wrote:
>>Sorry, I didnt follow the thread - what is the goal to be achieved with
>>the setup?
> 
> 
> A simple ingress shaping on ppp0 (PPPOE DSL line). I want to replace my old 
> imq ingress shaper in favor of ifb. My former script used iptables marks  to 
> classify the packets. My iptables marks are getting set, as like before with 
> imq. But tc seems not to recognize them: It only uses the default class.
> 
> So i run tcpdump -i ifb0  and discovered that the packets seems to be still 
> encapsulated on ifb0. I suppose this is why my iptables stuff is not working.

Thats actually a completely different problem. Unlike with imq, packets
are delivered to ifb *before* they pass through iptables. So at that
time they're not marked. I don't see a good solution for this that
allows to keep the iptables rules, I'd suggest to switch to ematches.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html