[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00e601c7fc31$4ed29890$ca8510ac@asimco>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:25:10 +0800
From: "John Ye" <johny@...mco.com.cn>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
<pekkas@...core.fi>, <jmorris@...ei.org>, <kaber@...eworks.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH: 2.6.13-15-SMP 3/3] network: concurrently run softirq network code on SMP
David,
Thanks for your reply. I understand it's not worth to do.
I have made it a loadable module to fulfill the function. it mainly for busy
NAT gateway server with SMP to speed up.
John Ye
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
To: <johny@...mco.com.cn>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>; <pekkas@...core.fi>;
<jmorris@...ei.org>; <kaber@...eworks.de>
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 1:46 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH: 2.6.13-15-SMP 3/3] network: concurrently run softirq
network code on SMP
>
> The whole reason the queues are per-cpu is so that we do not
> have to touch remote processor state nor use locks of any
> kind whatsoever.
>
> With multi-queue networking cards becoming more and more
> available, which will split up the packet workload in
> hardware across all available cpus, there is less and less
> reason to make a patch like this one.
>
> We've known about this issue for ages, and if we felt it
> was appropriate to make this change, we would have done
> so years ago.
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists