[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F3E695.7010604@candelatech.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 08:43:17 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
CC: Emil Micek <emil.micek@...jasek.cz>,
"auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
netdev mailing list <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: change the way e1000 is handling short VLAN frames
jamal wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-21-09 at 09:37 -0400, jamal wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2007-21-09 at 14:50 +0200, Emil Micek wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 07:59 -0400, jamal wrote:
>>>
>>>> Which would make it a bug. AFAIK, the minimum VLAN tagged packet going
>>>> out is 68 bytes.
>>>>
>>> Are you sure about this?
>>>
>> This is what i have always seen.
>>
>
> If the first email caused confusion - so will this ;->
> I have never used e1000 for vlan tagging. My view is that if it emits
> (instead of 68B) 64B packets with tags then it is buggy and needs to be
> fixed. Hope that makes sense.
>
I just re-read the spec, and a bridge *may* pad up to 68, but it is not
required.
On page 166, it says equipment must be able to handle 64 byte minimums.
See page 22 (section 7.2) of this document:
http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.1Q-1998.pdf
Also, page 63, 165, 166
Thanks,
Ben
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists