[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F40BC2.2000806@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:21:54 -0700
From: Bruce Cole <bacole@...il.com>
To: L F <lfabio.linux@...il.com>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bacole@...il.com
Subject: Re: e1000 driver and samba
L F wrote:
> Aha. This doesn't seem to be in mr. Romieu's patch above: should it go
> in on top of that?
>
His newer
0002-r8169-workaround-against-ignored-TxPoll-writes-8168.patch
does the same thing as the older quoted version, and is also
included in the roll-up patch he pointed you to.
I agree re. performance, and don't want to clutter the thread
realtek issues. I just wanted to clarify this particular
realtek-samba issue in case it's relevant. For a long time folks
suspected similar culprits (bad cable, half duplex, etc.) when
it was the driver. Perhaps you should try doing a ping flood
between server&client during your test. That healed the
problem by keeping the queue busy in the realtek case.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists