[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F6A887.1030301@opengridcomputing.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:55:19 -0500
From: Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pktgen question
Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Hi Steve.
>
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 11:12:12AM -0500, Steve Wise (swise@...ngridcomputing.com) wrote:
>> The pktgen module provides a way to "clone" the skb its using for
>> transmission, and allows passing N clones of the originally created skb
>> to the driver under test. However, it doesn't really use skb_clone(),
>> but rather it just bumps the skb->users count for each "clone" and
>> passes the same skb ptr to the driver.
>>
>> Q: Is that a valid use of skb->users or should pktgen really be cloning
>> the skbuff?
>
> It's a hack, but since skb is owned by pktgen only (no copies in some
> outside queues or some other access) it is allowed just to bump reference
> counter (i.e. 'share' skb in usual notation).
>
Its a hack that breaks cxgb3 because cxgb3 uses the skb->cb area for
each skb passed down. So cxgb3 is at fault then? IE a driver cannot
use the skb->cb field if the users count is > 1? Or maybe a driver can
_never_ use the cb field?
Steve.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists