[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1190574713.5030.4.camel@localhost>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:11:52 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, krkumar2@...ibm.com,
johnpol@....mipt.ru, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, kaber@...sh.net,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, jagana@...ibm.com,
Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se, rick.jones2@...com, xma@...ibm.com,
gaagaan@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rdreier@...co.com,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, mcarlson@...adcom.com,
mchan@...adcom.com, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
kumarkr@...ux.ibm.com, tgraf@...g.ch, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
sri@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] TX batching
On Sun, 2007-23-09 at 14:19 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> You should post at least a couple driver patches to see how its used on
> Real Hardware(tm)... :)
This is the tg3 patch i used for the testing - against whats in Daves
net-2.6.24 tree. Patch may be a bit hard to read.
For an example of an LLTX version look at the e1000 in the older git
tree at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/hadi/batch-lin26.git
If the intel folks will accept the patch i'd really like to kill
the e1000 LLTX interface.
The tg3 in that tree used the old style batch_xmit() interface.
cheers,
jamal
View attachment "tg3.p" of type "text/x-patch" (16360 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists