[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46F75968.4010307@candelatech.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:30:00 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: hadi@...erus.ca
CC: Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se>
Subject: Re: pktgen question
jamal wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-23-09 at 12:55 -0500, Steve Wise wrote:
>
>
>> Its a hack that breaks cxgb3 because cxgb3 uses the skb->cb area for
>> each skb passed down. So cxgb3 is at fault then? IE a driver cannot
>> use the skb->cb field if the users count is > 1? Or maybe a driver can
>> _never_ use the cb field?
>>
>
> any layer can use the cb structure whichever way they wish. There are
> violations, e.g:
> the vlan code also uses the cb field to pass vlan details for hardware
> acceleration. How does pktgen affect it though, clone() will just copy
> the cb field and pktgen doesnt touch it.
> In retrospect, pktgen may have to use clone - ccing Robert Olsson.
>
Pktgen abuses the ref count, as far as I can tell. It works with most
ethernet drivers,
but that multi-pkt will also fail with things like vlans because the
skb->dev is changed
as it is transmitted (to the lower-level device).
I'd say just don't use the multi-pkt with pktgen on devices that can't
handle it.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists