netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/7] CAN: Add PF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070925124138.GC18348@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:41:38 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Urs Thuermann <urs@...ogud.escape.de>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>,
	Oliver Hartkopp <oliver.hartkopp@...kswagen.de>,
	Urs Thuermann <urs.thuermann@...kswagen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] CAN: Add PF_CAN core module

Em Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 02:20:31PM +0200, Urs Thuermann escreveu:
> +
> +static void can_sock_destruct(struct sock *sk)
> +{
> +	DBG("called for sock %p\n", sk);
> +
> +	skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
> +	if (sk->sk_protinfo)
> +		kfree(sk->sk_protinfo);
> +}

Is it really needed to do this sk_protinfo check? You don't use it and
it is going to be removed (only user is one of the HAM radio protocols),
so it would be better to not add any more references to this struct sock
field.

- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html