[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D5C1322C3E673F459512FB59E0DDC32903A51586@orsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:31:46 -0700
From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
To: "Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: <hadi@...erus.ca>, "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
<krkumar2@...ibm.com>, <johnpol@....mipt.ru>,
<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <kaber@...sh.net>,
<jagana@...ibm.com>, <Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se>,
<rick.jones2@...com>, <xma@...ibm.com>, <gaagaan@...il.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <rdreier@...co.com>,
<mcarlson@...adcom.com>, <jeff@...zik.org>, <mchan@...adcom.com>,
<general@...ts.openfabrics.org>, <kumarkr@...ux.ibm.com>,
<tgraf@...g.ch>, <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>, <sri@...ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] [NET_SCHED] explict hold dev tx lock
> > I really just need to put my nose to the grindstone and get the
> > patches together and to the list...stay tuned.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -PJ Waskiewicz
> > -
>
>
> Since we are redoing this, is there any way to make the whole
> TX path more lockless? The existing model seems to be more
> of a monitor than a real locking model.
That seems quite reasonable. I will certainly see what I can do.
Thanks Stephen,
-PJ Waskiewicz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists