[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070925083303.6c1f7701@freepuppy.rosehill>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:33:03 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Urs Thuermann <urs@...ogud.escape.de>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>,
Oliver Hartkopp <oliver.hartkopp@...kswagen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] CAN: Add PF_CAN core module
On 25 Sep 2007 15:24:33 +0200
Urs Thuermann <urs@...ogud.escape.de> wrote:
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net> writes:
>
> > > + skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
> > > + if (sk->sk_protinfo)
> > > + kfree(sk->sk_protinfo);
> > > +}
> >
> > Is it really needed to do this sk_protinfo check?
>
> Thanks for finding this. This is from 2.6.12 times or so. We have
> other CAN protocol (which we are not allowed to put under GPL)
> implemenatations which still use the protinfo field. But we should
> change those and I will delete this check.
>
> urs
Then please make all exported symbols marked EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL to make
sure that the other CAN protocol can not reuse your infrastructure.
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists