[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1IaNQ7-0004DX-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:18:39 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org (Stephen Hemminger)
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Zero-length write() does not generate a datagram on connected socket
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> The bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5731
> describes an issue where write() can't be used to generate a zero-length
> datagram (but send, and sendto do work).
>
> I think the following is needed:
>
> --- a/net/socket.c 2007-08-20 09:54:28.000000000 -0700
> +++ b/net/socket.c 2007-09-24 15:31:25.000000000 -0700
> @@ -777,8 +777,11 @@ static ssize_t sock_aio_write(struct kio
> if (pos != 0)
> return -ESPIPE;
>
> - if (iocb->ki_left == 0) /* Match SYS5 behaviour */
> - return 0;
> + if (unlikely(iocb->ki_left == 0)) {
> + struct socket *sock = iocb->ki_filp->private_data;
> + if (sock->type == SOCK_STREAM)
> + return 0;
> + }
I'm not sure whether all STREAM protocols treat zero-length
sends as no-ops. What about SCTP?
Put it another way, do we really need to keep the short-circuit
for SOCK_STREAM?
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists