[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1ir5xrngu.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:55:29 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] net ipv4: Remove unnecessary test for the loopback device from inetdev_destroy
Currently we never call unregister_netdev for the loopback device so
it is impossible for us to reach inetdev_destroy with the loopback
device. So the test in inetdev_destroy is unnecessary.
Further when testing with my network namespace patches removing
unregistering the loopback device and calling inetdev_destroy works
fine so there appears to be no reason for avoiding unregistering the
loopback device.
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
net/ipv4/devinet.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/devinet.c b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
index affea9b..e7f2b02 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/devinet.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/devinet.c
@@ -203,8 +203,6 @@ static void inetdev_destroy(struct in_device *in_dev)
ASSERT_RTNL();
dev = in_dev->dev;
- if (dev == loopback_dev)
- return;
in_dev->dead = 1;
--
1.5.3.rc6.17.g1911
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists