[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1190880779.6158.0.camel@pasglop>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:12:59 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@....org>, hare@...e.de,
open-iscsi@...glegroups.com, hch@...radead.org,
davem@...emloft.net, mchristi@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
anilgv@...adcom.com, talm@...adcom.com, lusinsky@...adcom.com,
uri@...adcom.com, fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2][BNX2]: Add iSCSI support to BNX2 devices.
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 03:49 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 03:31 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >> A key problem I was hoping would be solved with your work here was
> >> the
> >> elimination of that post dma_map_sg() split.
> >>
> >> If I understood James and Ben correctly, one of the key problems was
> >> always in communicating libata's segment boundary needs to the IOMMU
> >> layers?
> >
> > Yup. If we can put some constraint in struct device that the dma mapping
> > code can then look at ... we also need to ensure that what's passed in
> > for DMA'ing already matches those constraints as well since no-iommu
> > platforms will basically just keep the dma table as-is.
>
> That's a good point... no-iommu platforms would need to be updated to
> do the split for me. I suppose we can steal that code from swiotlb or
> somewhere.
Doing the split means being able to grow the sglist... which the dma_*
calls can't do at least not in their current form.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists