| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20070928081918.GB2304@2ka.mipt.ru> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 12:19:19 +0400 From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: kaber@...sh.net, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, hadi@...erus.ca Subject: Re: [PKT_SCHED]: Add stateless NAT On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 12:52:39PM -0700, David Miller (davem@...emloft.net) wrote: > From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> > Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 15:39:34 +0200 > > > Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 09:20:37PM +0800, Herbert Xu (herbert@...dor.apana.org.au) wrote: > > > > > >>How about putting it in net/core/utils.c? > > > > > > > > > I knew, that was a bad idea to try to fix netfilter dependency :) > > > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter.h b/include/linux/netfilter.h > > > > > > This looks good to me. > > I still think the nf_*() prefixes should all go and the extern > prototypes should go into an independant header file. > > These are not netfilter routines, they are "INET" helpers. > > And we should make similar treatment for all of the ipv6 > packet parser helper functions that ipv6 netfilter needs. Should netfilter still have own nf_ prefixed functions which will just call the same ones without prefix from inet header? -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists