[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46FCC56D.9050600@fr.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:12:13 +0200
From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@...ibm.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add network namespace clone & unshare support.
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
>
>> Eric, pick an appropriate new non-conflicting number NOW.
>
> Done. My apologies for the confusion. I thought the
> way Cedric and the IBM guys were testing someone would have
> shouted at me long before now.
>
>> This adds unnecessary extra work for Andrew Morton, which he has
>> enough of already.
>
> Cedric made a good point that we will have conflicts of code
> being added to the same place in nsproxy.c and the like. So
> I copied Andrew to give him a heads up.
here's a suggestion,
we could keep the net namespace unshare patch out of david's tree,
let andrew merge and release a new -mm and, then, send the net namespace
unshare patch to andrew. that should keep nsproxy out of the andrew's
merge challenge. But david's tree will miss the unshare part for a while.
As for the clone flags, the values *must not* conflict but the patches
probably will.
C.
> I will gladly do what I can, to help. Working against 3 trees
> development at the moment is a bit of a development challenge.
>
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists