[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46FE9056.1070400@trash.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:50:14 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] net: Make AF_UNIX per network namespace safe.
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net> writes:
>
>>>Currently I don't fold the namesapce into the hash so multiple
>>>namespaces using the same socket name will be guaranteed a hash
>>>collision.
>>
>>
>>That doesn't sound like a good thing :) Is there a reason for
>>not avoiding the collisions?
>
>
> Two reasons. Minimizing the size of the changes to make review
> easier, and I don't know if hash collisions are likely in practice
> or if they matter. I don't believe we can't physically collide and
> have the same inode because we make a node in the filesystem. The
> abstract domain is local to linux and so people don't use it as much.
>
> All of which boils down to. I don't see it matter a heck of a lot
> especially initially. So I did the traditional unix thing and started
> with a simple and stupid implementation. But it didn't quite feel
> right to me either so I documented it.
>
> Whipping up a patch to take the namespace into account in mkname
> doesn't look to hard though.
It doesn't look like it would increase patch size significantly
(about 4 more changed lines), but it could of course be done in
a follow-up patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists