[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071001095106.GA7864@iris.sw.ru>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:51:06 +0400
From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@...nvz.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: devel@...nvz.org, containers@...ts.osdl.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
kaber@...sh.net, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rtnl_unlock cleanups
There is no need to process outstanding netlink user->kernel packets
during rtnl_unlock now. There is no rtnl_trylock in the rtnetlink_rcv
anymore.
Normal code path is the following:
netlink_sendmsg
netlink_unicast
netlink_sendskb
skb_queue_tail
netlink_data_ready
rtnetlink_rcv
mutex_lock(&rtnl_mutex);
netlink_run_queue(sk, qlen, &rtnetlink_rcv_msg);
mutex_unlock(&rtnl_mutex);
So, it is possible, that packets can be present in the rtnl->sk_receive_queue
during rtnl_unlock, but there is no need to process them at that moment as
rtnetlink_rcv for that packet is pending.
Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@...nvz.org>
Acked-by: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
--- ./net/core/rtnetlink.c.rtnl2 2007-08-26 19:30:38.000000000 +0400
+++ ./net/core/rtnetlink.c 2007-10-01 13:09:03.000000000 +0400
@@ -75,8 +75,6 @@ void __rtnl_unlock(void)
void rtnl_unlock(void)
{
mutex_unlock(&rtnl_mutex);
- if (rtnl && rtnl->sk_receive_queue.qlen)
- rtnl->sk_data_ready(rtnl, 0);
netdev_run_todo();
}
@@ -1319,11 +1317,9 @@ static void rtnetlink_rcv(struct sock *s
unsigned int qlen = 0;
do {
- mutex_lock(&rtnl_mutex);
+ rtnl_lock();
qlen = netlink_run_queue(sk, qlen, &rtnetlink_rcv_msg);
- mutex_unlock(&rtnl_mutex);
-
- netdev_run_todo();
+ rtnl_unlock();
} while (qlen);
}
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists