[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47015CBB.90109@fatooh.org>
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 13:46:51 -0700
From: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@...ooh.org>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] Preparatory refactoring part 2.
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Corey Hickey wrote:
>> The sfq_destroy() --> sfq_q_destroy() change looks pointless here,
>> but it's cleaner to split now and add code to sfq_q_destroy() in a
>> later patch.
>>
>> +static void sfq_destroy(struct Qdisc *sch)
>> +{
>> + struct sfq_sched_data *q = qdisc_priv(sch);
>> + sfq_q_destroy(q);
>> +}
>
>
> It does look pointless, after applying all patches sfq_destroy still
> remains a simply wrapper around sfq_q_destroy.
It does remain a wrapper, but both functions are used. It doesn't have
to be this way, but I wanted to avoid duplicating code and I didn't see
a better layout.
sfq_q_destroy is used in sfq_q_init if a kcalloc fails. sfq_q_init knows
nothing about "struct Qdisc *sch", so it can't call sfq_destroy.
sfq_destroy is still marked as the destroy function in sfq_qdisc_ops.
-Corey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists