[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071002.143255.57471247.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: lm@...mover.com
Cc: rick.jones2@...com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
wscott@...mover.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tcp bw in 2.6
From: lm@...mover.com (Larry McVoy)
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 11:40:32 -0700
> I doubt it, the same test works fine in one direction and poorly in the other.
> Wouldn't the flow control squelch either way?
HW controls for these things are typically:
1) Generates flow control flames
2) Listens for them
So you can have flow control operational in one direction
and not the other.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists