[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4702C37F.4030601@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:17:35 -0700
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: lm@...mover.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, wscott@...mover.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tcp bw in 2.6
David Miller wrote:
> From: lm@...mover.com (Larry McVoy)
> Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 14:26:08 -0700
>
>
>>And note that sky2 doesn't have this problem. Does the broadcom do TSO?
>>And sky2 not? I noticed a much higher CPU load for sky2.
>
>
> Yes the broadcoms (the revisions I have) do TSO and it is enabled
> on both sides.
>
> Which makes the mis-matched performance even stranger :)
Stranger still, with a mix of a 2.6.23-rc5ish kernel and a net-2.6.24 one
(pulled oh middle of last week?) I get link-rate and I see no asymmetry between
TCP_STREAM and TCP_MAERTS over an "e1000" link with no switch or tg3 with a
ProCurve on my rx2660's.
I can also run bw_tcp from lmbench 3.0a8 and get 106 MB/s.
I don't have a netgear switch to try in all this...
rick jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists