netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/7] CAN: Allocate protocol numbers for PF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <470258D0.2040901@hartkopp.net>
Date:	Tue, 02 Oct 2007 16:42:24 +0200
From:	Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC:	Urs Thuermann <urs@...ogud.escape.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>,
	Oliver Hartkopp <oliver.hartkopp@...kswagen.de>,
	Urs Thuermann <urs.thuermann@...kswagen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] CAN: Allocate protocol numbers for PF_CAN

Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:10:07PM +0200, Urs Thuermann escreveu:
>   
>>
>> Index: net-2.6.24/include/linux/if_arp.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- net-2.6.24.orig/include/linux/if_arp.h	2007-10-02 12:10:51.000000000 +0200
>> +++ net-2.6.24/include/linux/if_arp.h	2007-10-02 12:11:01.000000000 +0200
>> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
>>  #define ARPHRD_ROSE	270
>>  #define ARPHRD_X25	271		/* CCITT X.25			*/
>>  #define ARPHRD_HWX25	272		/* Boards with X.25 in firmware	*/
>> +#define ARPHRD_CAN	280		/* Controller Area Network      */
>>     
>
> Is 280 used in other OS? Just curious as why not using 273
>
>   

All these definitions (PF_*, AF_*, ARPHRD_* ) are operation system 
specific (that's why you find it in /usr/include/linux/*.h :)

I just googled for AF_INET and found that e.g.
AF_APPLETALK is "16" in winsock.h and "5" in include/linux/socket.h

The reason to use 280 instead of 273 was, that all the 27x stuff was 
dedicated to the X.25 domain. So to start with a new 280 looked 
reasonable to me.

At the end of the ARPHRD_* definitions there's currently many 'change 
traffic' due to IEEE80211.

Oliver

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html