[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47025EBC.5000301@hartkopp.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 17:07:40 +0200
From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC: Urs Thuermann <urs@...ogud.escape.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>,
Oliver Hartkopp <oliver.hartkopp@...kswagen.de>,
Urs Thuermann <urs.thuermann@...kswagen.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:10:11PM +0200, Urs Thuermann escreveu:
>
>
>> +
>> +/* To be moved to linux/can/dev.h */
>>
>
> Is this comment still valid? If so can this move happen now? If not I
> think it would be better to stick a "FIXME: " just before it, no?
>
>
Bringing all the current available CAN network device drivers into
Kernel style qualitiy is a TODO for the time after the PF_CAN core is
mainlined.
When more than this single vcan CAN netdev driver is part of the Kernel
it makes sense to put several things (like the common configuration
interface and commonly used library funtions for CAN drivers) into
linux/can/dev.h. And at that time this currently local DEBUG definition
should go there togehther with the other stuff.
Please think of all the comments, if we created a single dev.h file with
a single DEBUG definition used by a single vcan.c file ;-)
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists