netdev - Re: [PATCH][E1000E] some cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47028351.7090509@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:43:45 -0700
From:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To:	hadi@...erus.ca
CC:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][E1000E] some cleanups

jamal wrote:
> Auke,
> 
> heres part of something i promised. 
> I couldnt do any packet testing on because 82571EB is disabled in the
> driver. I uncommented the code out in the table, but the best i could
> get was the module loading, some probing and some sysfs renaming
> failures (probably a debianism); the machine access is intermittent, so
> thats as far as i could go. In any case, you probably have a good reason
> for disabling that chip. So, heres the patch, the burden of testing now
> falls on you ;->


the description of this patch is rather misleading, and the title certainly too.
Can you resend this with a bit more elaborate explanation as to why the cb code is
relevant to use here? Not only do I need to understand this, but others might want
to as well later on ;)

Cheers,

Auke
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html