[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071005.142001.88714271.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:20:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: netdev@...eo.de
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Ariel.Hendel@....com, greg.onufer@....com,
jeff@...zik.org, Ashley.Saulsbury@....com, Matheos.Worku@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Third (final?) release of Sun Neptune driver
From: Ingo Oeser <netdev@...eo.de>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:46:19 +0200
> David Miller schrieb:
> > +#define nr64(reg) readq(np->regs + (reg))
> > +#define nw64(reg, val) writeq((val), np->regs + (reg))
> > +
> > +#define nr64_mac(reg) readq(np->mac_regs + (reg))
> > +#define nw64_mac(reg, val) writeq((val), np->mac_regs + (reg))
> > +
> > +#define nr64_ipp(reg) readq(np->regs + np->ipp_off + (reg))
> > +#define nw64_ipp(reg, val) writeq((val), np->regs + np->ipp_off + (reg))
> > +
> > +#define nr64_pcs(reg) readq(np->regs + np->pcs_off + (reg))
> > +#define nw64_pcs(reg, val) writeq((val), np->regs + np->pcs_off + (reg))
> > +
> > +#define nr64_xpcs(reg) readq(np->regs + np->xpcs_off + (reg))
> > +#define nw64_xpcs(reg, val) writeq((val), np->regs + np->xpcs_off + (reg))
>
> Can these be static inline and get the "struct niu *np" passed?
Absolutely not, this was discussed to death in the first review. This
is a common sequence which is used in several driver, which saves a
lot of typing and carpel-tunnel syndrome.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists