netdev - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] TCP: fix lost retransmit detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071007.174202.121596339.takano@axe-inc.co.jp>
Date:	Sun, 07 Oct 2007 17:42:02 +0900 (JST)
From:	TAKANO Ryousei <takano@...-inc.co.jp>
To:	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	y-kodama@...t.go.jp
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] TCP: fix lost retransmit detection

From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] TCP: fix lost retransmit detection
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:17:14 -0700 (PDT)

> From: TAKANO Ryousei <takano@...-inc.co.jp>
> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 14:51:00 +0900 (JST)
> 
> > BTW, what is difference among netdev-2.6, net-2.6 (net-2.6.24), and 
> > tcp-2.6? I am not familiar with linux kernel development process.
> 
> net-2.6.24 tree is current new development
> 
> net-2.6 tree is only bug fixes
> 
> tcp-2.6 is an old abandonded tree that holds lots of old
> TCP work, most of which is merged already, but one part
> (my RB-Tree SACK patches) are not integrated yet.

Thanks, and I got it.

I need to check the related recent posts (SACK block validation, sacktag 
cache usage, and RT-tree SACK) on this list.

Ryousei Takano
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html