netdev - Re: [PATCH][E1000E] some cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <470AB1EC.2080000@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:40:44 -0700
From:	"Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To:	hadi@...erus.ca
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][E1000E] some cleanups

jamal wrote:
> Ok, here you go; the explanation is below. This is from net-2.6.24 of
> early this AM. I saw a patch you posted that is derived from Krishna;
> although it hasnt showed up in the tree - i have considered those
> changes and this patch adds a little more optimization in case of
> errors.
> 
> I will send you a patch to kill LLTX the sooner this shows up somewhere.


thanks.

My biggest problem with the patch as you sent it that it's a tonload of changes
and no implicit benefit immediately as I can see. I would really have to see the
LLTX change as well to make a wellfounded decision whether it is the right thing
to go and overhaul this part of the driver or not :)

I'm not particularly against the changes per se though.

so please, if needed offlist send me those LLTX changes as well.

Auke

> 
> On Wed, 2007-03-10 at 09:18 -0400, jamal wrote:
> 
>> The cleanup is to break up the code so it is functionally more readable
>> from a perspective of the 4 distinct parts in ->hard_start_xmit():
>>
>> a) packet formatting (example: vlan, mss, descriptor counting, etc.)
>> b) chip-specific formatting
>> c) enqueueing the packet on a DMA ring
>> d) IO operations to complete packet transmit, tell DMA engine to chew
>> on, tx completion interrupts, set last tx time, etc.
>>
>> Each of those steps sitting in different functions accumulates state
>> that is used in the next steps. cb stores this state because it a
>> scratchpad the driver owns. You could create some other structure and
>> pass it around the iteration, but why waste more bytes.
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html