netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/7] [IPSEC]: Remove bogus ref count in xfrm_secpath

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071009.132419.48798717.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:24:19 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [IPSEC]: Remove bogus ref count in
 xfrm_secpath_reject

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:36:31 +0800

> [IPSEC]: Remove bogus ref count in xfrm_secpath_reject
> 
> Constructs of the form
> 
> 	xfrm_state_hold(x);
> 	foo(x);
> 	xfrm_state_put(x);
> 
> tend to be broken because foo is either synchronous where this is totally
> unnecessary or if foo is asynchronous then the reference count is in the
> wrong spot.
> 
> In the case of xfrm_secpath_reject, the function is synchronous and therefore
> we should just kill the reference count.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>

Applied, thanks!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html