[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071009.134331.35664207.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: andi@...stfloor.org
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, johnpol@....mipt.ru, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
gaagaan@...il.com, Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, rdreier@...co.com,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, hadi@...erus.ca,
mcarlson@...adcom.com, jagana@...ibm.com,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org, mchan@...adcom.com, tgraf@...g.ch,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, sri@...ibm.com,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Date: 09 Oct 2007 18:51:51 +0200
> Hopefully that new qdisc will just use the TX rings of the hardware
> directly. They are typically large enough these days. That might avoid
> some locking in this critical path.
Indeed, I also realized last night that for the default qdiscs
we do a lot of stupid useless work. If the queue is a FIFO
and the device can take packets, we should send it directly
and not stick it into the qdisc at all.
> If the data is just passed on to the hardware queue, why is any
> locking needed at all? (except for the driver locking of course)
Absolutely.
Our packet scheduler subsystem is great, but by default it should just
get out of the way.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists