[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1191967006.5324.14.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:56:46 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
jeff@...zik.org, johnpol@....mipt.ru, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
gaagaan@...il.com, Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, rdreier@...co.com,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, mcarlson@...adcom.com,
jagana@...ibm.com, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
mchan@...adcom.com, tgraf@...g.ch, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
sri@...ibm.com, kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching
On Tue, 2007-09-10 at 14:22 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> Even if the device has "huge queues" I still think we need a software
> queue for when the hardware one backs up.
It should be fine to just "pretend" the qdisc exists despite it sitting
in the driver and not have s/ware queues at all to avoid all the
challenges that qdiscs bring;
if the h/ware queues are full because of link pressure etc, you drop. We
drop today when the s/ware queues are full. The driver txmit lock takes
place of the qdisc queue lock etc. I am assuming there is still need for
that locking. The filter/classification scheme still works as is and
select classes which map to rings. tc still works as is etc.
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists