[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071008.194706.97044591.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc: hadi@...erus.ca, jeff@...zik.org, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com,
krkumar2@...ibm.com, johnpol@....mipt.ru, kaber@...sh.net,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, jagana@...ibm.com,
Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se, rick.jones2@...com, xma@...ibm.com,
gaagaan@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, rdreier@...co.com,
mcarlson@...adcom.com, mchan@...adcom.com,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org, tgraf@...g.ch,
randy.dunlap@...cle.com, sri@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 10:16:20 +0800
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:14:30PM -0400, jamal wrote:
> >
> > You forgot QDISC_RUNNING Dave;-> the above cant happen.
> > Essentially at any one point in time, we are guaranteed that we can have
> > multiple cpus enqueueing but only can be dequeueing (the one that
> > managed to grab QDISC_RUNNING) i.e multiple producers to the qdisc queue
> > but only one consumer. Only the dequeuer has access to the txlock.
>
> Good point. You had me worried for a sec :)
>
> Dave, Jamal's patch is fine as it is and doesn't actually create
> any packet reordering.
Ok, then, I'll un-revert. :-)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists