netdev - Re: raw PF_PACKET protocol selection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:51:25 +0200
From:	Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
To:	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc:	'Herbert Xu' <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: raw PF_PACKET protocol selection

On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 11:34 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 09:27:38AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund (joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se) wrote:
> > > Did you change eth_type_trans() to catch your proto?
> > > 
> > 
> > Just fond out something:
> > if I redirect my prog like so:
> > ./sniff > log
> > and press Ctrl-C after a packet has been sent to it, 
> > it does NOT work. I don't get ANY output in my "log" file, not
> > even the printf("---------\n") appears.
> > But if I run whithout redirect it works(at least with ETH_P_BPQ)
> > Anyone else see this too?
> 
> I only tested with IP and ARP packets - I can not say when packet was
> actually received and written to log, but it does start filling up, but
> maybe not immediately - it can be output buffering in shell though.

Did you receive many packets? Seems like when I receive just 1 or 2 pkgs
I get the empty log. If I strace ./sniff > log I see that recvfrom gets
pkgs, but there are no trace of writes. I guess this
is a bash(3.2_p17) or glibc(2.5.-r4) bug?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html