lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <470B77A9.600@garzik.org>
Date:	Tue, 09 Oct 2007 08:44:25 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	krkumar2@...ibm.com, gaagaan@...il.com,
	general@...ts.openfabrics.org, hadi@...erus.ca,
	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, jagana@...ibm.com,
	johnpol@....mipt.ru, kaber@...sh.net, mcarlson@...adcom.com,
	mchan@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
	rdreier@...co.com, rick.jones2@...com, Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se,
	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, sri@...ibm.com, tgraf@...g.ch,
	xma@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching

David Miller wrote:
> From: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
> Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 16:51:14 +0530
> 
>> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote on 10/09/2007 04:32:55 PM:
>>
>>> Ignore LLTX, it sucks, it was a big mistake, and we will get rid of
>>> it.
>> Great, this will make life easy. Any idea how long that would take?
>> It seems simple enough to do.
> 
> I'd say we can probably try to get rid of it in 2.6.25, this is
> assuming we get driver authors to cooperate and do the conversions
> or alternatively some other motivated person.
> 
> I can just threaten to do them all and that should get the driver
> maintainers going :-)

What, like this?  :)

	Jeff




View attachment "patch" of type "text/plain" (13350 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ