[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1191935402.4373.172.camel@localhost>
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:10:02 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, gaagaan@...il.com,
general@...ts.openfabrics.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
jagana@...ibm.com, jeff@...zik.org, johnpol@....mipt.ru,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, kumarkr@...ux.ibm.com,
mcarlson@...adcom.com, mchan@...adcom.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
rdreier@...co.com, rick.jones2@...com, Robert.Olsson@...a.slu.se,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, sri@...ibm.com, tgraf@...g.ch,
xma@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET_BATCH] net core use batching
On Tue, 2007-09-10 at 08:39 +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> Driver might ask for 10 and we send 10, but LLTX driver might fail to get
> lock and return TX_LOCKED. I haven't seen your code in greater detail, but
> don't you requeue in that case too?
For others drivers that are non-batching and LLTX, it is possible - at
the moment in my patch i whine that the driver is buggy. I will fix this
up so it checks for NETIF_F_BTX. Thanks for pointing the above use case.
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists