netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] [TCP]: Limit processing lost

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071010.024446.66177094.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
	takano@...-inc.co.jp
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] [TCP]: Limit processing lost_retrans loop to
 work-to-do cases

From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 02:44:03 -0700 (PDT)

> From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
> Date: Tue,  9 Oct 2007 15:20:02 +0300
> 
> > This addition of lost_retrans_low to tcp_sock might be
> > unnecessary, it's not clear how often lost_retrans worker is
> > executed when there wasn't work to do.
> > 
> > Cc: TAKANO Ryousei <takano@...-inc.co.jp>
> > Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
> 
> I wanted to apply this, but it doesn't go cleanly on top of
> net-2.6.24, can you respin this patch for me?

Nevermind, I mis-interpreted the ordering of the 3 patches,
sorry...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html