[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071010.211654.85404234.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 21:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtnl: Simplify ASSERT_RTNL
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:59:08 -0600
>
> Currently we have the call path:
> macvlan_open -> dev_unicast_add -> __dev_set_rx_mode ->
> __dev_set_promiscuity -> ASSERT_RTNL -> mutex_trylock
>
> When mutex debugging is on taking a mutex complains if we are not
> allowed to sleep. At that point we have called netif_tx_lock_bh
> so we are clearly not allowed to sleep. Arguably this is not a
> problem for mutex_trylock.
>
> However we can avoid the complaint and make the ASSERT_RTNL code
> cheaper, faster and more obvious by simply calling mutex_is_locked.
>
> So this patch adds rtnl_is_locked (which does mutex_is_locked on
> the rtnl_mutex) and changes ASSERT_RTNL to use that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
There was a lot of discussion about how to do this right and
therefore you'll need to resubmit all of this with this
discussioned issues addressed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists